Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 1, P71-89, February 2020

Gynecologic Malignancies

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Hematology/Oncology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bray F.
        • Ferlay J.
        • Soerjomataram I.
        • et al.
        Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424
        • Siegel R.L.
        • Miller K.D.
        • Jemal A.
        Cancer statistics, 2018.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 7-30
        • Morice P.
        • Leary A.
        • Creutzberg C.
        • et al.
        Endometrial cancer.
        Lancet. 2016; 387: 1094-1108
        • Lancaster J.M.
        • Powell C.B.
        • Chen L.M.
        • et al.
        Society of Gynecologic Oncology statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 136: 3-7
      1. ACOG committee opinion no. 557: management of acute abnormal uterine bleeding in nonpregnant reproductive-aged women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 891-896
        • Creasman W.
        Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 105: 109
        • McMeekin D.
        • Benedet J.
        • Broaddus R.
        • et al.
        Corpus uteri.
        in: Stephen E. Byrd D. Compton C. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7 edition. Springer-Verlag, New York2010: 718
        • Rossi E.C.
        • Kowalski L.D.
        • Scalici J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: 384-392
        • Holloway R.W.
        • Abu-Rustum N.R.
        • Backes F.J.
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 146: 405-415
        • Mäenpää M.M.
        • Nieminen K.
        • Tomás E.I.
        • et al.
        Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: 588.e1-7
        • Janda M.
        • Gebski V.
        • Davies L.C.
        • et al.
        Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Hysterectomy for Stage I Endometrial Cancer Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Hysterectomy for Stage I Endometrial Cancer.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 1224-1233
        • Koh W.J.
        • Abu-Rustum N.R.
        • Bean S.
        • et al.
        Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16: 170-199
        • McMeekin D.S.
        • Filiaci V.L.
        • Aghajanian C.
        • et al.
        1A randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiation therapy (PXRT) versus vaginal cuff brachytherapy followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy (VCB/C) in patients with high risk (HR), early stage endometrial cancer (EC): A Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 134: 438
        • Randall M.E.
        • Filiaci V.
        • McMeekin D.S.
        • et al.
        Phase III Trial: adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy versus vaginal brachytherapy plus paclitaxel/carboplatin in high-intermediate and high-risk early stage endometrial cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 1810-1818
        • de Boer S.M.
        • Powell M.E.
        • Mileshkin L.
        • et al.
        Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19: 295-309
        • de Boer S.M.
        • Powell M.E.
        • Mileshkin L.
        • et al.
        Toxicity and quality of life after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: 1114-1126
        • Matei D.
        • Filiaci V.L.
        • Randall M.
        • et al.
        A randomized phase III trial of cisplatin and tumor volume directed irradiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. carboplatin and paclitaxel for optimally debulked, advanced endometrial carcinoma.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 5505
        • Matei D.
        • Filiaci V.
        • Randall M.E.
        • et al.
        Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 2317-2326
        • Goodman C.R.
        • Hatoum S.
        • Seagle B.-L.L.
        • et al.
        Association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sequence with overall survival in locoregionally advanced endometrial cancer.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 153: 41-48
        • Cohen P.A.
        • Jhingran A.
        • Oaknin A.
        • et al.
        Cervical cancer.
        Lancet. 2019; 393: 169-182
        • Bhatla N.
        • Aoki D.
        • Sharma D.N.
        • et al.
        Cancer of the cervix uteri.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 143: 22-36
        • Woo S.
        • Suh C.H.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging for detection of parametrial invasion in cervical cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature between 2012 and 2016.
        Eur Radiol. 2018; 28: 530-541
        • Gee M.S.
        • Atri M.
        • Bandos A.I.
        • et al.
        Identification of distant metastatic disease in uterine cervical and endometrial cancers with FDG PET/CT: analysis from the ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 multicenter trial.
        Radiology. 2018; 287: 176-184
        • Koh W.J.
        • Abu-Rustum N.R.
        • Bean S.
        • et al.
        Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019; 17: 64-84
        • Ramirez P.T.
        • Frumovitz M.
        • Pareja R.
        • et al.
        Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 1895-1904
        • Melamed A.
        • Margul D.J.
        • Chen L.
        • et al.
        Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 1905-1914
        • U.S. Food & Drug Administration
        FDA approves pembrolizumab for advanced cervical cancer with disease progression during or after chemotherapy.
        (Available at:)
        • Chung H.C.
        • Ros W.
        • Delord J.P.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 1470-1478
        • Hollebecque A.
        • Meyer T.
        • Moore K.N.
        • et al.
        An open-label, multicohort, phase I/II study of nivolumab in patients with virus-associated tumors (CheckMate 358): Efficacy and safety in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 5504
        • Han K.
        • Leung E.
        • Barbera L.
        • et al.
        Circulating human papillomavirus DNA as a biomarker of response in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation.
        JCO Precis Oncol. 2018; : 1-8
        • Pecorelli S.
        Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 105: 103-104
        • Koh W.J.
        • Greer B.E.
        • Abu-Rustum N.R.
        • et al.
        Vulvar cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15: 92-120
        • Te Grootenhuis N.C.
        • van der Zee A.G.J.
        • van Doorn H.C.
        • et al.
        Sentinel nodes in vulvar cancer: Long-term follow-up of the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar cancer (GROINSS-V) I.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 140: 8-14
        • Chapman B.V.
        • Gill B.S.
        • Viswanathan A.N.
        • et al.
        Adjuvant radiation therapy for margin-positive vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: defining the ideal dose-response using the national cancer data base.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 97: 107-117
        • Ignatov T.
        • Eggemann H.
        • Burger E.
        • et al.
        Adjuvant radiotherapy for vulvar cancer with close or positive surgical margins.
        J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016; 142: 489-495
        • Kunos C.
        • Simpkins F.
        • Gibbons H.
        • et al.
        Radiation therapy compared with pelvic node resection for node-positive vulvar cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 537-546
        • Parthasarathy A.
        • Cheung M.K.
        • Osann K.
        • et al.
        The benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in single-node-positive squamous cell vulvar carcinoma.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103: 1095-1099
        • Montana G.S.
        • Thomas G.M.
        • Moore D.H.
        • et al.
        Preoperative chemo-radiation for carcinoma of the vulva with N2/N3 nodes: a gynecologic oncology group study.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 48: 1007-1013
        • Moore D.H.
        • Ali S.
        • Koh W.J.
        • et al.
        A phase II trial of radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 124: 529-533
        • Wahlen S.A.
        • Slater J.D.
        • Wagner R.J.
        • et al.
        Concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.
        Cancer. 1995; 75: 2289-2294
        • Russell A.H.
        • Mesic J.B.
        • Scudder S.A.
        • et al.
        Synchronous radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy for locally advanced or recurrent squamous cancer of the vulva.
        Gynecol Oncol. 1992; 47: 14-20
        • PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board
        Vulvar cancer treatment (PDQ(R)): health professional version. PDQ cancer information summaries.
        National Cancer Institute (US), Bethesda (MD)2019
        • Landrum L.M.
        • Lanneau G.S.
        • Skaggs V.J.
        • et al.
        Gynecologic Oncology Group risk groups for vulvar carcinoma: improvement in survival in the modern era.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 106: 521-525
        • Lee L.J.
        • Howitt B.
        • Catalano P.
        • et al.
        Prognostic importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 positivity in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with radiotherapy.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 142: 293-298
        • Salani R.
        • Khanna N.
        • Frimer M.
        • et al.
        An update on post-treatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommendations.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 146: 3-10
        • Viswanathan A.N.
        • Lee L.J.
        • Eswara J.R.
        • et al.
        Complications of pelvic radiation in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies.
        Cancer. 2014; 120: 3870-3883
        • Song Y.
        • Erickson B.
        • Chen X.
        • et al.
        Appropriate magnetic resonance imaging techniques for gross tumor volume delineation in external beam radiation therapy of locally advanced cervical cancer.
        Oncotarget. 2018; 9: 10100-10109
        • Verma J.
        • Sulman E.P.
        • Jhingran A.
        • et al.
        Dosimetric predictors of duodenal toxicity after intensity modulated radiation therapy for treatment of the para-aortic nodes in gynecologic cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88: 357-362
        • Gaffney D.K.
        • King B.
        • Viswanathan A.N.
        • et al.
        Consensus recommendations for radiation therapy contouring and treatment of vulvar carcinoma.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 95: 1191-1200
        • Klopp A.H.
        • Moughan J.
        • Portelance L.
        • et al.
        Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 86: 83-90
        • Klopp A.H.
        • Yeung A.R.
        • Deshmukh S.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported toxicity during pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy: NRG oncology-RTOG 1203.
        J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 2538-2544
        • Rao Y.J.
        • Chundury A.
        • Schwarz J.K.
        • et al.
        Intensity modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Treatment technique and outcomes.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017; 2: 148-158
        • Jurgenliemk-Schulz I.M.
        • Beriwal S.
        • de Leeuw A.A.C.
        • et al.
        Management of nodal disease in advanced cervical cancer.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019; 29: 158-165
        • Cheng J.Y.
        • Huang E.Y.
        • Hsu S.N.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the parametrium and cervix in radiotherapy for uterine cervical carcinoma: a dosimetric study using a new alternative approach.
        Br J Radiol. 2016; 89: 20160526
        • Vergalasova I.
        • Light K.
        • Chino J.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for treatment of gynecologic carcinoma: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy.
        Med Dosim. 2017; 42: 230-237
        • Boyle J.
        • Craciunescu O.
        • Steffey B.
        • et al.
        Methods, safety, and early clinical outcomes of dose escalation using simultaneous integrated and sequential boosts in patients with locally advanced gynecologic malignancies.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 135: 239-243
        • Holschneider C.H.
        • Petereit D.G.
        • Chu C.
        • et al.
        Brachytherapy: A critical component of primary radiation therapy for cervical cancer: From the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS).
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18: 123-132
        • Viswanathan A.N.
        • Thomadsen B.
        American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles.
        Brachytherapy. 2012; 11: 33-46
        • Fokdal L.
        • Sturdza A.
        • Mazeron R.
        • et al.
        Image guided adaptive brachytherapy with combined intracavitary and interstitial technique improves the therapeutic ratio in locally advanced cervical cancer: Analysis from the retroEMBRACE study.
        Radiother Oncol. 2016; 120: 434-440
        • de Arcos J.
        • Schmidt E.J.
        • Wang W.
        • et al.
        Prospective clinical implementation of a novel magnetic resonance tracking device for real-time brachytherapy catheter positioning.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 99: 618-626
        • Tod M.C.
        • Meredith W.J.
        A dosage system for use in the treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix.
        Br J Radiol. 1938; 11: 809-824
        • Dimopoulos J.C.
        • Petrow P.
        • Tanderup K.
        • et al.
        Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103: 113-122
        • Sturdza A.
        • Potter R.
        • Fokdal L.U.
        • et al.
        Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Improved pelvic control and survival in RetroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study.
        Radiother Oncol. 2016; 120: 428-433
        • Mazeron R.
        • Fokdal L.U.
        • Kirchheiner K.
        • et al.
        Dose-volume effect relationships for late rectal morbidity in patients treated with chemoradiation and MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: Results from the prospective multicenter EMBRACE study.
        Radiother Oncol. 2016; 120: 412-419
        • Gill B.S.
        • Lin J.F.
        • Krivak T.C.
        • et al.
        National Cancer Data Base analysis of radiation therapy consolidation modality for cervical cancer: the impact of new technological advancements.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 90: 1083-1090
        • Robin T.P.
        • Amini A.
        • Schefter T.E.
        • et al.
        Disparities in standard of care treatment and associated survival decrement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 143: 319-325